Bonjour a tous ,
le "symptome" :
- sur un ping -I 1 ip 400 300 , un v1280 affiche un 7 % de packet loss.
- un autre v1280 , sous le meme solaris 8 , dans la meme infra , avec
les meme cisco 2950 , ping la meme ip sans perdre de packet
j'ai teste pleins de trucs differents , pour en arriver a .... *rien* .
Enfin plus precisement , etre incapable de donner la raison , ou tout du
moins le "coupable"
le seul constat que j'ai , est qu'apparemment en reduisant la data_size
, les pertes de packets diminuent voire disparaisse quand c'est a 4
pour ajouter des infos , quelques cmds passes sur la machine qui ne
fonctionne pas correct
# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=1000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
ce0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
inet 10.0.42.137 netmask fffffff0 broadcast 10.0.42.143
ether 0:3:ba:7d:ae:c1
qfe0:
flags=69040843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER,STANDBY,INACTIVE>
mtu 1500 index 3
inet 192.168.16.31 netmask ffffffc0 broadcast 192.168.16.63
groupname services-net
ether 0:3:ba:5d:98:fc
qfe1:
flags=69040843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER,STANDBY,INACTIVE>
mtu 1500 index 4
inet 192.168.16.84 netmask ffffffc0 broadcast 192.168.16.127
groupname donnees-net
ether 0:3:ba:5d:98:fd
qfe5: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 5
inet 192.168.16.25 netmask ffffffc0 broadcast 192.168.16.63
groupname services-net
ether 0:3:ba:6d:3f:c3
qfe5:1:
flags=9040843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER>
mtu 1500 index 5
inet 192.168.16.28 netmask ffffffc0 broadcast 192.168.16.63
qfe6: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 6
inet 192.168.16.75 netmask ffffffc0 broadcast 192.168.16.127
groupname donnees-net
ether 0:3:ba:6d:3f:c4
qfe6:1:
flags=9040843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER>
mtu 1500 index 6
inet 192.168.16.83 netmask ffffffc0 broadcast 192.168.16.127
#
# ping -I 1 192.168.16.63 500 10
PING 192.168.16.63: 500 data bytes
508 bytes from netsol08-serv (192.168.16.25): icmp_seq=0. time=0. ms
ICMP Time exceeded in transit from 192.168.16.4
for icmp from netsol08-serv-ipmp1 (192.168.16.28) to 192.168.16.63
508 bytes from netsol07-serv (192.168.16.24): icmp_seq=0. time=1. ms
508 bytes from netsol06-serv (192.168.16.23): icmp_seq=0. time=2. ms
508 bytes from netsol03-serv (192.168.16.21): icmp_seq=0. time=2. ms
508 bytes from netsol04-serv (192.168.16.22): icmp_seq=0. time=2. ms
ICMP Time exceeded in transit from 192.168.16.5
for icmp from netsol08-serv-ipmp1 (192.168.16.28) to 192.168.16.63
508 bytes from netsol08-serv (192.168.16.25): icmp_seq=1. time=0. ms
508 bytes from netsol06-serv (192.168.16.23): icmp_seq=1. time=0. ms
508 bytes from netsol03-serv (192.168.16.21): icmp_seq=1. time=0. ms
508 bytes from netsol04-serv (192.168.16.22): icmp_seq=1. time=0. ms
508 bytes from netsol07-serv (192.168.16.24): icmp_seq=1. time=1. ms
----192.168.16.63 PING Statistics----
2 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 5.00 times amplification
round-trip (ms) min/avg/max = 0/0/2
#
Quelqu'un a une idee ?
_______________________________________________
Solaris_fr liste de diffusion en français pour Solaris, sur toutes architectures
[email protected]
http://x86.sun.com/mailman/listinfo/solaris_fr
