[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-73?page=comments#action_12454189 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-73: ----------------------------------
I imagine most users aren't putting together filters by looking up java class names, right? They are looking at the existing filters in schema.xml and re-arranging them, or looking in the Wiki for the correct line to cut-n-paste to get it to do what they want. To most users, it's just configuration, not class names. It seems like there should be some easy way of saying "lowercase these tokens" other than giving the full name of the factory to create a tokenizer. Why one needs to specify a Factory (like we need to now) seems harder to explain to someone else. > schema.xml and solrconfig.xml use CNET-internal class names > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-73 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-73 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Bug > Components: search > Reporter: Walter Underwood > > The configuration files in the example directory still use the old > CNET-internal class names, like solr.LRUCache instead of > org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache. This is confusing to new users and should > be fixed before the first release. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
