[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471810
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-152:
-------------------------------
>> q=<!lucene>*:*
one of the major focuses of dismax is to take the hassle out of front end
client code needing to "preprocess" user queries ... an approach like this
would require that the client notice when no query is specified, and set teh q
appropraitely (it would also probably require that the client allways put
"<!dismax>" in front of most input to "escape" the possibility of a user
searching on something like "<!lucene>"
at a broader level: annotating the "q" doesn't really address the issue of
letting the "solrconfig owner" specify what the behavior should be: an extra
param can be baked into the config, but a prefix on a user query can not.
> Dismax should not require 'q'
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-152
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-152
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
> Reporter: Ryan McKinley
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: SOLR-152-DismaxNoQ.patch, SOLR-152-DismaxNoQ.patch
>
>
> using fq=xxx should be sufficient to make a valid query
> see:
> http://www.nabble.com/dismax-without-q%3D-tf3198431.html#a8880594
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
