: How do you all feel about moving: : XmlUpdateRequestHandler -> XppUpdateRequestHandler : StaxUpdateRequestHandler -> XmlUpdateRequestHandler : : then deprecating XppUpdateRequestHandler? This will urge people to use : the Stax implemenation sooner then later and should help iron out any : problems sooner then later.
I'm kinda out of the looop on the whole Stax/Xpp/Xml update parsing stuff ... am i remembering correctly the end game goal is to reduce/eliminate dependencies on XPP? (because .... ? .... stax is Java "standard" included out-of-the-box with java6? (i'm guessing)) : Here is the actual test code: those are some fairly small documents ... we should probably test out some bigger inputs. A lot of people seem to be sending multiple documents at a time as well, so we should test that use case (ie: <add> containing 10000 small documents; <add> containg 100 medium documents; <add> containing 1 big document) for teh purpose of perf teesting the XML parsing it might also make sense to use a schema where every field is ignored (ie: no analysys, no stored values) to help isolate the parsing costs. -Hoss
