so we should test that use case (ie: <add> containing 10000 small
documents;
For processing a single request with 10000 documents, the existing XPP
update handler is faster then the new StaxUpdateHandler.
XPP: 6888 6714
STAX: 8665 8313
I looked into it, and the difference seems to be entirely in the logging
strategy. the XPP handler prints out a single line for all 10K docs:
INFO: added id={0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,1...
the STAX one sends each document to the processor that logs the add
individually:
INFO: added id={0} in 28ms [29]
INFO: added id={1} in 3ms [33]
INFO: added id={2} in 1ms [35]
...
If I remove logging, the same test runs in:
STAX: 6783 6834
essentially equivalent to the XPP version
ryan
