Sorry I'm out of the loop on this. In the last two weeks, I planned a
wedding, got married saturday and moved out of our apartment. We are
now driving east to DC.
I'll try to catch up on this thread in a week (or so)
thanks
ryan
Yonik Seeley (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522333 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-139:
-----------------------------------
how about using <update> instead of <add>
We had previously talked about making this distinction (and configuration for
each field) in the URL:
http://localhost:8983/solr/update?mode=title:overwrite,cat:distinct
This makes it usable and consistent for different update handlers and formats
(CSV, future SQL, future JSON, etc)
but perhaps if we allowed the <add> tag to optionally be called something more
neutral like <docs>?
wrt patches, I think the functionality needs refactoring so that modify
document logic is in the update handler. It seems like it's the only clean way
from a locking perspective, and it also leaves open future optimizations (like
using different indices depending on the fieldname and using a parallel reader
across them).
Support updateable/modifiable documents
---------------------------------------
Key: SOLR-139
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: update
Reporter: Ryan McKinley
Assignee: Ryan McKinley
Attachments: getStoredFields.patch, getStoredFields.patch,
getStoredFields.patch, getStoredFields.patch, getStoredFields.patch,
SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch,
SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch,
SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch,
SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch,
SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch,
SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-ModifyInputDocuments.patch,
SOLR-139-ModifyInputDocuments.patch, SOLR-139-ModifyInputDocuments.patch,
SOLR-139-ModifyInputDocuments.patch, SOLR-139-XmlUpdater.patch,
SOLR-269+139-ModifiableDocumentUpdateProcessor.patch
It would be nice to be able to update some fields on a document without having
to insert the entire document.
Given the way lucene is structured, (for now) one can only modify stored fields.
While we are at it, we can support incrementing an existing value - I think
this only makes sense for numbers.
for background, see:
http://www.nabble.com/loading-many-documents-by-ID-tf3145666.html#a8722293
