I'll put in my plug for reviewing/committing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-342
as well, so that we can use the new RAM based indexing code, too. :-)
-Grant
On Jan 23, 2008, at 11:25 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
OK, we're now on Lucene 2.3.
I didn't mention scorePayload in CHANGES... it was marked experimental
at the time, it's very rare for anyone to be using payloads in Solr
yet, and if they do hit this then they should get a clear error
message from the JVM.
But it can still be added to CHANGES if someone still thinks it's
important.
-Yonik
On Jan 23, 2008 9:39 PM, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 23-Jan-08, at 5:50 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
I plan on updating Lucene to 2.3 when it becomes official.... I
assume
there will be no objections, but if there are, holler quickly :-)
None here. The one thing is that we should mention in CHANGES that
the compatibility of the payload api in similarity is broken
(scorePayload()).
-Mike
