ryantxu wrote: > > As long as there is strong opposition, I think we can deal with JUL... > We can; an attempt to mitigate JUL & the functional need is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-549 SOLR-549 . It does respect the JUL choice and is a practical compromise that noone seems to seek... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Solr-Logging-tp16836646p16976929.html Sent from the Solr - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: Solr Logging Shalin Shekhar Mangar
- Re: Solr Logging Thomas Peuss
- Re: Solr Logging Grant Ingersoll
- Re: Solr Logging Ryan McKinley
- Re: Solr Logging Chris Hostetter
- Re: Solr Logging David Smiley @MITRE.org
- Re: Solr Logging Chris Hostetter
- Re: Solr Logging David Smiley @MITRE.org
- Re: Solr Logging Ryan McKinley
- Re: Solr Logging David Smiley @MITRE.org
- Re: Solr Logging Henrib
- Re: Solr Logging David Smiley @MITRE.org
- Re: Solr Logging Henrib
- Re: Solr Logging David Smiley @MITRE.org
- Re: Solr Logging Henrib
- Re: Solr Logging Chris Hostetter
- Re: Solr Logging Chris Hostetter
- Re: Solr Logging Ryan McKinley
- Re: Solr Logging Grant Ingersoll
- Re: Solr Logging Chris Hostetter
- Re: Solr Logging Grant Ingersoll