we are dangerously close to a release. Do we have enough time to ensure that it won't throw any unpleasant surprises?
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm pro 6.1.11. I've used it on several occasions now and haven't seen any > problems with it. > > > Otis > -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org >> Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2008 6:40:44 PM >> Subject: Re: Solr 1.3 release date >> >> On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:25:32 -0400 >> "Yonik Seeley" wrote: >> >> > 1) The current version has been tested for a year with this specific >> > application (Solr) and thus it's less risky sticking with it, esp >> > since we haven't seen any problems. >> >> agreed. >> >> > 2) Many bugs have been fixed in the latest patch release of Jetty... >> > and just because we don't think we've encountered bugs in the old >> > version doesn't mean that others won't. >> >> indeed, and these could affect newcomers to SOLR that use the sample setup >> as a >> comparison point... as I understand it, there have been some performance >> improvements in Jetty, at least on/from 6.1.5, but I don't know enough about >> it >> to say whether they would affect a SOLR installation. >> >> > IMO, If we don't upgrade now, it makes sense to upgrade immediately >> > after a 1.3 release. >> >> np - let me know how/when and I'll be happy to chip in. >> B >> _________________________ >> {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome >> >> My wish is that your day will be a good one. >> If not....... >> May the fleas of one thousand camels infest the crotch of the person who >> screws >> up your day and may their arms be too short to scratch. >> >> I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. >> Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been >> Warned. > > -- --Noble Paul
