Ok, just to summarize: We will maintain separate changelogs for both SolrJ and DIH. We should also make sure these changelogs are included in the nightly tarballs.
Even if they are internal changes, no harm in documenting them in a single place. Besides it is the only place where we give credit to our contributors in a proper fashion. So should we move all SolrJ and DIH related changes to their respective changelogs? I share Otis's concern on the inflating main changelog file. On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think an independent location for solrj changes is a good thing. They > are not relevant for anyone using any other client... the ruby client has > its own changelog. Solrj is a bit strange though since it is used within > the SearchComponents. > > Since solrj has not yet been released, the coverage in CHANGES.txt it a bit > limited -- i don't think it is important for to follow all the internal > changes. > > Re independent change log for DIH? that sounds good to me. > > ryan > > -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
