> the ruby client has its own changelog.
Oops. I wasn't aware of it's existence. But it's name is CHANGES.yml,
not CHANGES.txt,
and the contents look like gem update info maintained by Erik.
If Solrj and DIH have their own CHANGES.txt, should solr-ruby have its
CHANGES.txt?
Koji
Ryan McKinley wrote:
I think an independent location for solrj changes is a good thing.
They are not relevant for anyone using any other client... the ruby
client has its own changelog. Solrj is a bit strange though since it
is used within the SearchComponents.
Since solrj has not yet been released, the coverage in CHANGES.txt it
a bit limited -- i don't think it is important for to follow all the
internal changes.
Re independent change log for DIH? that sounds good to me.
ryan
