[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12623003#action_12623003
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-647:
------------------------------------
bq. I'm thinking of changing the cores map to <String,SolrCore> (from
<String,CoreDescriptor>) and removing getCore() from CoreDescriptor. Thoughts?
since every core has a CoreDescriptor, this seems much cleaner then have the
(existing) double link.
bq. is there any reason not to allow the same core to be registered more than
once if desired?
sounds good.
> Do SolrCore.close() in a refcounted way
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-647
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-647
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.3
> Reporter: Noble Paul
> Assignee: Yonik Seeley
> Fix For: 1.3
>
> Attachments: refcount_example.patch, solr-647.patch, solr-647.patch,
> solr-647.patch, solr-647.patch, solr-647.patch, solr-647.patch,
> solr-647.patch, solr-647.patch, solr-647.patch, SOLR-647.patch, SOLR-647.patch
>
>
> The method _SolrCore.close()_ directly closes the core . It can cause
> Exceptions for in-flight requests. The _close()_ method should just do a
> decrement on refcount and the actual close must happen when the last request
> being processed by that core instance is completed
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
