[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628624#action_12628624
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-567:
---------------------------------
As a general approach , A pluggable SolrCore does not look like a very good
idea. Too many components depend on too many methods on SolrCore. So ,you will
have to support all/most of them to be compatible .
Corrrect me if I am wrong. You may only wish to plugin a IndexSearcher and and
IndexWriter. If we make the SolrIndexSearcher and SolrIndexWriter pluggable
,that can be easier
> SolrCore Pluggable
> ------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-567
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-567
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.3
> Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
> Attachments: solr-567.patch, solr-567.patch
>
>
> SolrCore needs to be an abstract class with the existing functionality in a
> subclass. SolrIndexSearcher the same. It seems that most of the Searcher
> methods in SolrIndexSearcher are not used. The new abstract class need only
> have the methods used by the other Solr classes. This will allow other
> indexing and search implementations to reuse the other parts of Solr. Any
> other classes that have functionality specific to the Solr implementation of
> indexing and replication such as SolrConfig can be made abstract.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
