Ocean integration should really be targeted at solr 2 I think, so API
compatibility shouldn't be a large barrier.
Noble Paul (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628624#action_12628624 ]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-567:
---------------------------------
As a general approach , A pluggable SolrCore does not look like a very good
idea. Too many components depend on too many methods on SolrCore. So ,you will
have to support all/most of them to be compatible .
Corrrect me if I am wrong. You may only wish to plugin a IndexSearcher and and
IndexWriter. If we make the SolrIndexSearcher and SolrIndexWriter pluggable
,that can be easier
SolrCore Pluggable
------------------
Key: SOLR-567
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-567
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 1.3
Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
Attachments: solr-567.patch, solr-567.patch
SolrCore needs to be an abstract class with the existing functionality in a
subclass. SolrIndexSearcher the same. It seems that most of the Searcher
methods in SolrIndexSearcher are not used. The new abstract class need only
have the methods used by the other Solr classes. This will allow other
indexing and search implementations to reuse the other parts of Solr. Any
other classes that have functionality specific to the Solr implementation of
indexing and replication such as SolrConfig can be made abstract.
