Jason Rutherglen wrote:
It's mostly dead and synchronizes on reads and writes.

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please consider using JDBM, now in the Apache incubator,
It doesn't look like it's in the incubator yet... there was interest,
but a proposal was never put on the wiki.

Oh, indeed. I remembered reading about it and trying to get it from the incubator, but in the end I got it from SF. Sorry for the confusion.


but with a long
history at SF.net and wide usage. Its API is essentially the same as BDB.
You wouldn't be able to tell by the SourceForge page - it has the look
of a dead project.

The project is semi-dead (a zombie? ;) ), there has been some activity recently if you know where to look - which is not the SF CVS repo, but confusingly the SVN repo:

        https://jdbm.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/jdbm

It would be a shame if this project died, that's about the only option out there of a Java dbm-like data store under a liberal license.


--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki     <><
 ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _   __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/|  Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__||  \|  ||  |  Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com  Contact: info at sigram dot com

Reply via email to