On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HSQLDB has a limit of upto 8GB of data. In Solr, you might want to go beyond
> that without a commit.

Ah, so you only use the DB to store the uncommitted docs so you can
quickly reference their fields?

If that's all, we might be able to get that functionality from Lucene
(IndexWriter would need to support getting the latest stored fields by
term at least).

The other option is to actually store the stored fields permanently in
the DB... and get them from the DB instead of Lucene when requested.
That's the road I thought you were going down.

-Yonik


> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Dawid Weiss
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>>
>> Isn't HSQLDB an option? Its performance ranges a lot depending on the
>> volume of data and queries, but otherwise the license looks BSDish.
>>
>> http://hsqldb.org/web/hsqlLicense.html
>>
>> Dawid
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>
        • Re: Can w... Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
  • Re: Can we use Berkley... Grant Ingersoll
    • Re: Can we use Be... Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
      • Re: Can we us... Yonik Seeley
        • Re: Can w... Andrzej Bialecki
          • Re: C... Yonik Seeley
            • ... Jason Rutherglen
              • ... Andrzej Bialecki
              • ... Dawid Weiss
              • ... Shalin Shekhar Mangar
              • ... Yonik Seeley
              • ... Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
              • ... Ryan McKinley
              • ... Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
              • ... Andrzej Bialecki
              • ... Grant Ingersoll
              • ... Ryan McKinley
              • ... Mark Miller
              • ... Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
              • ... Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
              • ... Sami Siren

Reply via email to