[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12677726#action_12677726
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-940:
------------------------------------
{quote}
bq. Assuming TrieRange does all the number mojo needed in lucene, should it
eventually replace the existing number implementaions?
Not until we can support sorting. Also, trie indexes many tokens per value,
increasing the index size. Users who do not need range searches should not pay
this penalty.
{quote}
If the precisionStep is configureable, you can simply use 32 (for ints) or 64
(for longs) to not create additional precisions.
> TrieRange support
> -----------------
>
> Key: SOLR-940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Yonik Seeley
> Fix For: 1.4
>
> Attachments: SOLR-940.patch
>
>
> We need support in Solr for the new TrieRange Lucene functionality.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
