[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-940:
---------------------------------------

    Attachment: SOLR-940.patch

Updating javadocs to note that trie fields cannot be used in function queries. 
No other changes.

What do people feel about committing this patch?

Another thought - If we can write a ValueSource for trie fields whose DocValues 
return only the first indexed term, we should be able to use function queries. 
Will this be too expensive if Lucene does not support building such field 
caches for us?

If this can be done then basic sorting would be possible through function 
queries (though they would be part of the score). However one still would not 
be able to use trie fields in the sort parameter (or mix their sorting with 
non-numeric fields).

> TrieRange support
> -----------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-940
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-940
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Yonik Seeley
>             Fix For: 1.4
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-940.patch, SOLR-940.patch, SOLR-940.patch, 
> SOLR-940.patch, SOLR-940.patch, SOLR-940.patch, SOLR-940.patch, SOLR-940.patch
>
>
> We need support in Solr for the new TrieRange Lucene functionality.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to