On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Ian Holsman<[email protected]> wrote:
> Is bandwidth or disk space really an issue for people today ?
>
> you should be focusing on decreasing the size and speed of indexing stuff
> not the code-base. It's not like you guys have unlimited time to spend on
> this project.

This does not have to be a code change . It just just has to be a new
build target  (even that is code, but...)


downloading 100MB is not very pleasant if you keep downloading
nightlies every now and then.

>
> ps. if you don't have the examples in there, then people won't know that
> feature exists.
>
> and yes. i regularly copy the example schema to create a new index. I know
> it's bad practice, and not the most efficient schema, but it usually has the
> cool features enabled in it ;-)
>
> Noble Paul ??????? ?????? wrote:
>>
>> +1 for solr lite
>>
>> A lot of users are fine without those example stuff (dih , cell)
>>
>> one option is to have two different distributions. solr.zip and a
>> solr-min.zip
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Matthew Runo<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'd be willing to guess that the vast majority of users start off with
>>> the
>>> example app and customize from there to meet their needs.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your time!
>>>
>>> Matthew Runo
>>> Software Engineer, Zappos.com
>>> [email protected] - 702-943-7833
>>>
>>> On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:04 PM, Eric Pugh wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone really complained about the size of Solr?  One of the things
>>>> I
>>>> like about Solr is how simple it is to get things up and running, and
>>>> how
>>>> accesible the example directory makes everything.  When I first played
>>>> with
>>>> DIH and Cell, everything was there.  I didn't have to chase down .jar's
>>>> from
>>>> multiple places.  Maybe if it was as simple as "ant build-example-cell"
>>>> and
>>>> "ant build-example-dih" then there might not be a barrier to entry for
>>>> new
>>>> users.
>>>>
>>>> I'd be curious to hear what percentage of folks deploy solr based on the
>>>> example app, and how many just start out with the most stripped down
>>>> solr.war and build everything up from there?
>>>>
>>>> Eric
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Should be easy enough to conjure up the Ant magic.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 10, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for bringing this up Patrick... clearly it would be nice to
>>>>>> avoid (or mandate) 100MB downloads!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Yonik
>>>>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:50 PM, patrick o'leary <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just using the apache-solr example directory, it seems to have gotten
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> bit
>>>>>>> big
>>>>>>> e.g.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> $ du -sh *
>>>>>>> 13M     apache-solr-1.3.0
>>>>>>> 92M     apache-solr-1.4.0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The biggest space user being example-DIH
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> apache-solr-1.4.0/example
>>>>>>> $ du -sh *
>>>>>>> 4.0K    README.txt
>>>>>>> 5.5M    clustering
>>>>>>> 80K     etc
>>>>>>> *32M     example-DIH*
>>>>>>> 42K     exampleAnalysis
>>>>>>> 168K    exampledocs
>>>>>>> 13M     lib
>>>>>>> 52K     logs
>>>>>>> 118K    multicore
>>>>>>> *31M     solr*
>>>>>>> 20K     start.jar
>>>>>>> 12M     webapps
>>>>>>> 12K     work
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> solr/lib is now 30mb
>>>>>>> apache-solr-1.4.0/example/solr/lib
>>>>>>> $ ls -lhS
>>>>>>> total 30M
>>>>>>> -rwx------ 1 pjaol None  14M Jun 10 17:08 ooxml-schemas-1.0.jar
>>>>>>> -rwx------ 1 pjaol None 4.3M Jun 10 17:08 icu4j-3.8.jar
>>>>>>> -rwx------ 1 pjaol None 3.2M Jun 10 17:08 pdfbox-0.7.3.jar
>>>>>>> -rwx------ 1 pjaol None 2.6M Jun 10 17:08 xmlbeans-2.3.0.jar
>>>>>>> -rwx------ 1 pjaol None 1.5M Jun 10 17:08 poi-3.5-beta5.jar
>>>>>>> -rwx------ 1 pjaol None 1.2M Jun 10 17:08 xercesImpl-2.8.1.jar
>>>>>>> -rwx------ 1 pjaol None 1.1M Jun 10 17:08 bcprov-jdk14-132.jar
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> as opposed to 0 for 1.3.0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This pushes solr to over a 100mb download for features that I'm sure
>>>>>>> can be
>>>>>>> packaged up separately as they look seldom used.
>>>>>>> It would make sense if there's going to be a batteries included
>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> also have a solr-lite version.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> P
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --------------------------
>>>>> Grant Ingersoll
>>>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika/Droids)
>>>>> using
>>>>> Solr/Lucene:
>>>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>>> Eric Pugh | Principal | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
>>>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com
>>>> Free/Busy: http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com

Reply via email to