[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12722922#action_12722922
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-1229:
------------------------------------
I plan on committing this patch later this week. It fixes the problems we've
had. Please review and comment further if there are still holes... but we
really should be discussing this with unit tests. I hope to see some of those
this week from Lance.
> deletedPkQuery feature does not work when pk and uniqueKey field do not have
> the same value
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1229
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1229
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: contrib - DataImportHandler
> Affects Versions: 1.4
> Reporter: Erik Hatcher
> Fix For: 1.4
>
> Attachments: SOLR-1229.patch, SOLR-1229.patch, SOLR-1229.patch
>
>
> Problem doing a delta-import such that records marked as "deleted" in the
> database are removed from Solr using deletedPkQuery.
> Here's a config I'm using against a mocked test database:
> {code:xml}
> <dataConfig>
> <dataSource driver="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver" url="jdbc:mysql://localhost/db"/>
> <document name="tests">
> <entity name="test"
> pk="board_id"
> transformer="TemplateTransformer"
> deletedPkQuery="select board_id from boards where deleted = 'Y'"
> query="select * from boards where deleted = 'N'"
> deltaImportQuery="select * from boards where deleted = 'N'"
> deltaQuery="select * from boards where deleted = 'N'"
> preImportDeleteQuery="datasource:board">
> <field column="id" template="board-${test.board_id}"/>
> <field column="datasource" template="board"/>
> <field column="title" />
> </entity>
> </document>
> </dataConfig>
> {code}
> Note that the uniqueKey in Solr is the "id" field. And its value is a
> template board-<PK>.
> I noticed the javadoc comments in DocBuilder#collectDelta it says "Note: In
> our definition, unique key of Solr document is the primary key of the top
> level entity". This of course isn't really an appropriate assumption.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
