On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Erik Hatcher <[email protected]>wrote:
> > But... since transformations are applied, solr_id will be in that map too, > which is the uniqueKey value. Problem solved! :) > Erik, the most common use-case is the name of the table's primary key being different from Solr's uniqueKey. We should not force the user to write a Transformer to convert between them. This was the motivation behind keeping the pk attribute. I don't think pk should be removed at all. -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
