[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12745516#action_12745516
 ] 

Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1362:
------------------------------------

bq. Yonik, in this case I think existing gaps would be preserved with the =

What if the big position increment was on a token that was all delimiters?

I agree that it makes more sense for "LUCENE / SOLR" to be translated to LUCENE 
SOLR without a gap though (provided that there are no gaps to start with).

Should the rule be, subtract 1 from the cumulative position increment if the 
increment of the current token being added is >=1 ?


> WordDelimiterFilter position increment bug
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1362
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1362
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Analysis
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: SOLR-1362.patch
>
>
> WordDelimiterFilter sometimes assigns high position increment values, which 
> inhibits phrase matches.
> If this is a feature and not a bug please change the issue type, and I will 
> change the patch to propose this as an option...

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to