: > I just realized we still have "o.a.s.schema.Trie*Field" classes in Solr : > but Lucene switched to using "NumericField" ... should we convert the Solr : > class names prior to 1.4? : : I dunno - NumericField is too generic. We still have two other types : of numeric fields.
I'm fine with that ... I just wanted to make sure it was something we at least thought about (and not just an oversight) -Hoss
