Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Chris Hostetter > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I just realized we still have "o.a.s.schema.Trie*Field" classes in Solr >> but Lucene switched to using "NumericField" ... should we convert the Solr >> class names prior to 1.4? >> > > I dunno - NumericField is too generic. We still have two other types > of numeric fields. > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com > I spotted the same thing this morning and was about to raise it when I came to the same conclusion.
-- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com
