On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 02:57:33PM -0700, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Check out the dir structure mentioned here:
> http://markmail.org/message/gwpmaevw7tavqqge
> 
> Isn't that what we want?

I think the downside of that hierarchy is that you will need the "modules"
directory if you're working on Lucene, and with Solr under "modules/solr",
you'll have to get all of Solr, too.

If Solr were a thin layer for sharding, I agree that would be a good place for
it... but as things stand, that's gonna be one big "modules" checkout.

Marvin Humphrey

Reply via email to