On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 02:57:33PM -0700, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > Check out the dir structure mentioned here: > http://markmail.org/message/gwpmaevw7tavqqge > > Isn't that what we want?
I think the downside of that hierarchy is that you will need the "modules" directory if you're working on Lucene, and with Solr under "modules/solr", you'll have to get all of Solr, too. If Solr were a thin layer for sharding, I agree that would be a good place for it... but as things stand, that's gonna be one big "modules" checkout. Marvin Humphrey