On 03/22/2010 at 2:30 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I'm confused... what is the need for a new name? The only place where > > there is a conflict is in the top level svn tree... > > Agree, no need to re-brand.
Hmm, I've apparently misunderestimated the name-mooting that's been echoing around lately. Since "name" can refer to a bunch of partially overlapping things (Apache TLP name; svn directory name; development project name; product name; etc.): - Lucene will remain the name of the Apache TLP hosting both the Lucene-Java product and the Solr product. - Solr, while ceasing to refer to a stand-alone development sub-project, will continue to be a product, with no change in its user-facing *product* communications; Solr's downloadable artifacts, the wiki, the website, and the solr-user mailing list will remain as-is. (The website javadocs will need re-jiggering, though, I'd guess.) Any disagreement? Steve
