Thanks Matt, I'll give it a try! So this requires JettyPlus? -- Best regards, Jack
Wednesday, September 12, 2007, 5:14:32 AM, you wrote: > Jack, I've posted a complete recipe for running two Solr indices > within one Jetty 6 container: > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrJetty > Scroll down to the part that says: >> (7/2007 MattKangas) The recipe above didn't work for me with Jetty >> 6.1.3. >> >> ... >> >> I'm glossing over a lot of details, so attached is a tarball with a >> known-good configuration that runs two Solr instances inside one >> Jetty container. I'm using Solr 1.2.0 and Jetty 6.1.3 respectively. >> >> > Hope this helps, > --matt > On Sep 11, 2007, at 11:52 AM, Jack L wrote: >> I was going through some old emails on this topic. Rafael Rossini >> figured >> out how to run multiple indices on single instance of jetty but it >> has to >> be jetty plus. I guess jetty doesn't allow this? I suppose I can add >> additional jars and make it work but I haven't tried that. It'll >> always be much safer/simpler/less playing around if a feature is >> available out of box. >> >> I'm mentioning this again because I really think it's a desirable >> feature, >> especially because each JVM uses a lot of memory and sometimes it's >> not possible to start a new jetty for each index due to memory >> limitation. >> >> I understand I can use a type field and mix doc types but this is not >> ideal for two reasons: >> >> 1. it's easier to maintain separate indices. I can just wipe out all >> the files and re-post an individual index. Much less posting work to >> do as opposed to re-posting all docs. Or I can move one index to >> another partition, or even to another server to run separately in >> order to scale up. It'll be a problem (although solvable by deleting >> and re-posting) with a mixed index. >> >> 2. my understanding is that mixed index means larger index files and >> slower performance >> >> JettyPlus's download links seem to be broken so I wasn't able to check >> its download size. If not too big, maybe JettyPlus is an option? >> If not, there should be a way to have this feature implemented on solr >> side? Maybe by prefixing the REST URLs with index names... >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Jack >> > -- > Matt Kangas / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
