If you do copyField equivalent in the request processor (there is a URP for that) before the script one, you would then not need to do the copyField in the schema. So, a move, not a duplicate.
Or are things more complicated than that? Regards, Alex. Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853 On 12 September 2014 15:49, Douglas Stonham <douglas.ston...@software.dell.com> wrote: > I'm using the StatelessScriptUpdateProcessorFactory to run a script against > data as it is imported. > > Some relevant pieces from solrconfig.xml: > > <requestHandler name="/dataimport" > class="org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandler"> > <lst name="defaults"> > <str name="config">data-config.xml</str> > <str name="update.chain">textCopyByLang</str> > </lst> > </requestHandler> > > <updateRequestProcessorChain name="textCopyByLang"> > <processor class="solr.StatelessScriptUpdateProcessorFactory"> > <str name="script">textCopyByLang.js</str> > </processor> > <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > </updateRequestProcessorChain> > > In schema.xml I have a number of fields all being combined into one "text" > field using copyField. Unfortunately this apparently doesn't happen until > after the processor chain has completed so the script can't make use of the > combined text. > > i.e. > doc = cmd.solrDoc; > text = doc.getFieldValue("text"); // text is null > > > Is there a way around this without duplicating all the copyFields inside the > processing script? > > Thanks, > > Douglas
