Hi Alex, That seems fair. The only downside I can think of is that I have to include the copyField URP in every request handler that imports data. Not convenient but not a big problem either.
Do you happen to know the name of the URP that performs the copyField functionality? I looked through the list at (http://www.solr-start.com/info/update-request-processors/) but don't see one that obviously fills the role (sorry if I missed something obvious). I could easily write one using the script URP but that sounds like it would be much less performant than something built in. Thanks, Douglas > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexandre Rafalovitch [mailto:arafa...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 1:36 PM > To: solr-user > Subject: Re: Running an updateProcessor after copyField has occurred? > > If you do copyField equivalent in the request processor (there is a > URP for that) before the script one, you would then not need to do the > copyField in the schema. So, a move, not a duplicate. > > Or are things more complicated than that? > > Regards, > Alex. > Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov > Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart > Solr popularizers community: > https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853 > > > On 12 September 2014 15:49, Douglas Stonham > <douglas.ston...@software.dell.com> wrote: > > I'm using the StatelessScriptUpdateProcessorFactory to run a script against > data as it is imported. > > > > Some relevant pieces from solrconfig.xml: > > > > <requestHandler name="/dataimport" > class="org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandler"> > > <lst name="defaults"> > > <str name="config">data-config.xml</str> > > <str name="update.chain">textCopyByLang</str> > > </lst> > > </requestHandler> > > > > <updateRequestProcessorChain name="textCopyByLang"> > > <processor > > class="solr.StatelessScriptUpdateProcessorFactory"> > > <str name="script">textCopyByLang.js</str> > > </processor> > > <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > > <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" /> > > </updateRequestProcessorChain> > > > > In schema.xml I have a number of fields all being combined into one "text" > field using copyField. Unfortunately this apparently doesn't happen until > after the processor chain has completed so the script can't make use of the > combined text. > > > > i.e. > > doc = cmd.solrDoc; > > text = doc.getFieldValue("text"); // text is null > > > > > > Is there a way around this without duplicating all the copyFields inside the > processing script? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Douglas
