1GB is too small to start. Try starting the same on both: -Xms8196m -Xmx8196m
We use 12GB for these on a similar sized index and it works good. Send schema.xml and solrconfig.xml. Try not to store fields as much as possible. On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 8:08 AM, wwang525 <wwang...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I built the Solr index with 14 M records. > > I have > 20 G RAM in my local machine, and the Solr instance was started > with -Xms1024m -Xmx8196m > > The following query: > > > http://localhost:8983/solr/db-mssql/select?q=*:*&fq=GatewayCode:(YYZ)&fq=DestCode:(CUN)&fq=Duration:(5 > OR 6 OR 7 OR 8)&fq=DateDep:([20150610 TO > > 20150810])&facet=true&facet.field=DestCode&facet.field=DateDep&facet.field=GatewayCode&facet.field=HotelName&facet.sort=count&facet.limit=40&facet.mincount=1&rows=30&group=true&group.field=HotelCode&group.ngroups=true&group.facet=true&debugQuery=true > > The response found a total matched base records of 98105, these records > were > grouped at hotelcode level to give the ngroups: 143, however, the query > only > retrieve the first base record of each group, and only 30 groups were > retrieved. > > The performance statistics: > > Total response time in solr.log: 1791 ms > From the query response page: the query took 764 ms and facet took 1007 ms. > Debug took 13 ms > > This is a typical query that business need. Previously, I was testing the > data size of 6 M and no faceted search, the typical response time at single > request scenario was around 200 ms. > > Please let me know if additional information is needed. > > Thanks > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-do-a-Data-sharding-for-data-in-a-database-table-tp4212765p4213648.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076
