If I remember well , it is going to be as a phrase query ( when you use the
"quotes") .
So the close proximity means a match of the phrase with 0 tolerance ( so
the terms must respect the position distance in the query).
If I remember well I debugged that recently.

Cheers

On 16 February 2016 at 11:42, Modassar Ather <modather1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Actually you can get it with the edismax.
> Just set mm to 100% and then configure a pf field ( or more) .
> You are going to search all the search terms mandatory and boost phrases
> match .
>
> @Alessandro Thanks for your insight.
> I thought that the document will be boosted if all of the terms appear in
> close proximity by setting pf. Not sure how much is meant by the close
> proximity. Checked it on dismax query parser wiki too.
>
> Best,
> Modassar
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Alessandro Benedetti <
> abenede...@apache.org
> > wrote:
>
> > Binoy, the omitTermFreqAndPositions is set only for text_ws which is used
> > only on the "indexed_terms" field.
> > The text_general fields seem fine to me.
> >
> > Are you omitting norms on purpose ? To be fair it could be relevant in
> > title or short topic searches to boost up short field values, containing
> a
> > lot of terms from the searched query.
> >
> > To respond Modassar :
> >
> > I don't think the phrase will be searched as individual ANDed terms until
> > > the query has it like below.
> > > "Eating Disorders" OR (Eating AND Disorders).
> > >
> >
> > Actually you can get it with the edismax.
> > Just set mm to 100% and then configure a pf field ( or more) .
> > You are going to search all the search terms mandatory and boost phrases
> > match .
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On 16 February 2016 at 07:57, Emir Arnautovic <
> > emir.arnauto...@sematext.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Nitin,
> > > You can use pf parameter to boost results with exact phrase. You can
> also
> > > use pf2 and pf3 to boost results with bigrams (phrase matches with 2
> or 3
> > > words in case input is with more than 3 words)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Emir
> > >
> > >
> > > On 16.02.2016 06:18, Nitin.K wrote:
> > >
> > >> I am using edismax parser with the following query:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> localhost:8983/solr/tgl/select?q=eating%20disorders&wt=xml&tie=1.0&rows=200&q.op=AND&indent=true&defType=edismax&stopwords=true&lowercaseOperators=true&debugQuery=true&qf=topic_title%5E100+subtopic_title%5E40+index_term%5E20+drug%5E15+content%5E3&pf2=topTitle%5E200+subTopTitle%5E80+indTerm%5E40+drugString%5E30+content%5E6
> > >>
> > >> Configuration of schema.xml
> > >>
> > >> <field name="topic_title" type="text_general" indexed="true"
> > stored="true"
> > >> />
> > >> <field name="topTitle" type="string" indexed="true" stored="false"/>
> > >>
> > >> <field name="subtopic_title" type="text_general" indexed="true"
> > >> stored="true"/>
> > >> <field name="subTopTitle" type="string" indexed="true"
> stored="false"/>
> > >>
> > >> <field name="index_term" type="text_ws" indexed="true" stored="true"
> > >> multiValued="true"/>
> > >> <field name="indTerm" type="string" indexed="true" stored="false"
> > >> multiValued="true"/>
> > >>
> > >> <field name="drug" type="text_ws" indexed="true" stored="true"
> > >> multiValued="true"/>
> > >> <field name="drugString" type="string" indexed="true" stored="false"
> > >> multiValued="true"/>
> > >>
> > >> <field name="content" type="text_general" indexed="true"
> stored="true"/>
> > >>
> > >> <copyField source="topic_title" dest="topTitle"/>
> > >> <copyField source="subtopic_title" dest="subTopTitle"/>
> > >> <copyField source="index_term" dest="indTerm"/>
> > >> <copyField source="drug" dest="drugString"/>
> > >>
> > >> <fieldType name="text_general" class="solr.TextField"
> > >> positionIncrementGap="100" omitNorms="true">
> > >>         <analyzer type="index">
> > >>                         <tokenizer
> > class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
> > >>                         <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory"
> > >> ignoreCase="true"
> > >> words="stopwords.txt" />
> > >>                         <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> > >>         </analyzer>
> > >>         <analyzer type="query">
> > >>                         <tokenizer
> > class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
> > >>                         <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory"
> > >> ignoreCase="true"
> > >> words="stopwords.txt" />
> > >>                         <filter class="solr.SynonymFilterFactory"
> > >> synonyms="synonyms.txt"
> > >> ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
> > >>                         <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> > >>         </analyzer>
> > >> </fieldType>
> > >> <fieldType name="text_ws" class="solr.TextField"
> > >> positionIncrementGap="100"
> > >> omitTermFreqAndPositions="true" omitNorms="true">
> > >>         <analyzer>
> > >>                         <tokenizer
> > >> class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
> > >>                         <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory"
> > >> ignoreCase="true"
> > >> words="stopwords.txt" />
> > >>                         <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> > >>         </analyzer>
> > >> </fieldType>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I want , if user will search for a phrase then that pharse should
> always
> > >> takes the priority in comaprison to the individual words;
> > >>
> > >> Example: "Eating Disorders"
> > >>
> > >> First it will search for "Eating Disorders" together and then the
> > >> individual
> > >> words "Eating" and "Disorders"
> > >> but while searching for individual words, it will always return those
> > >> documents where both the words should exist for which i am already
> using
> > >> q.op="AND" in my query.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Nitin
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> View this message in context:
> > >>
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257510.html
> > >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > > Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
> > > Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --------------------------
> >
> > Benedetti Alessandro
> > Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti
> >
> > "Tyger, tyger burning bright
> > In the forests of the night,
> > What immortal hand or eye
> > Could frame thy fearful symmetry?"
> >
> > William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England
> >
>



-- 
--------------------------

Benedetti Alessandro
Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti

"Tyger, tyger burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?"

William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England

Reply via email to