Sorry for the misleading mail, actually if you play with the slop factor,
that is going to be easy.

A proximity search can be done with a sloppy phrase query. The closer
> together the two terms appear in the document, the higher the score will
> be. A sloppy phrase query specifies a maximum "slop", or the number of
> positions tokens need to be moved to get a match.


I assume playing with pf and ps should be your solution.

Cheers

On 16 February 2016 at 12:50, Alessandro Benedetti <abenede...@apache.org>
wrote:

> You can describe the pf field as an exact phrase query : ""~0 .
> But
> You can specify the slop with :
>
> The ps Parameter
>
> Default amount of slop on phrase queries built with pf, pf2 and/or pf3 fields
> (affects boosting).
>
> Just take a look to the edismax page in the wiki, it seems well described :
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+Extended+DisMax+Query+Parser
>
> But if this is what you want :
>
> Query : A B
>
> Results :
>
> 1) A B
>
> 2) A C B
>
> 3) A C C B
>
> ...
>
> 4) A C C C C C C C C C B
>
>
> It's not going to be simple.
>
> On 16 February 2016 at 12:33, Binoy Dalal <binoydala...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> By my understanding, it will depend on whether you're explicitly running
>> the phrase query or whether you're also searching for the terms
>> individually.
>> In the first case, it will not match.
>> In the second case, it will match just as long as your field contains all
>> the terms.
>>
>> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, 17:52 Modassar Ather <modather1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > In that case will a phrase with a given slop match a document having the
>> > terms of the given phrase with more than the given slop in between them
>> > when pf field and mm=100%? Per my understanding as a phrase it will not
>> > match for sure.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Modassar
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Alessandro Benedetti <
>> > abenede...@apache.org
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> > > If I remember well , it is going to be as a phrase query ( when you
>> use
>> > the
>> > > "quotes") .
>> > > So the close proximity means a match of the phrase with 0 tolerance (
>> so
>> > > the terms must respect the position distance in the query).
>> > > If I remember well I debugged that recently.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers
>> > >
>> > > On 16 February 2016 at 11:42, Modassar Ather <modather1...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Actually you can get it with the edismax.
>> > > > Just set mm to 100% and then configure a pf field ( or more) .
>> > > > You are going to search all the search terms mandatory and boost
>> > phrases
>> > > > match .
>> > > >
>> > > > @Alessandro Thanks for your insight.
>> > > > I thought that the document will be boosted if all of the terms
>> appear
>> > in
>> > > > close proximity by setting pf. Not sure how much is meant by the
>> close
>> > > > proximity. Checked it on dismax query parser wiki too.
>> > > >
>> > > > Best,
>> > > > Modassar
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Alessandro Benedetti <
>> > > > abenede...@apache.org
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Binoy, the omitTermFreqAndPositions is set only for text_ws which
>> is
>> > > used
>> > > > > only on the "indexed_terms" field.
>> > > > > The text_general fields seem fine to me.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Are you omitting norms on purpose ? To be fair it could be
>> relevant
>> > in
>> > > > > title or short topic searches to boost up short field values,
>> > > containing
>> > > > a
>> > > > > lot of terms from the searched query.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > To respond Modassar :
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I don't think the phrase will be searched as individual ANDed
>> terms
>> > > until
>> > > > > > the query has it like below.
>> > > > > > "Eating Disorders" OR (Eating AND Disorders).
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Actually you can get it with the edismax.
>> > > > > Just set mm to 100% and then configure a pf field ( or more) .
>> > > > > You are going to search all the search terms mandatory and boost
>> > > phrases
>> > > > > match .
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Cheers
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 16 February 2016 at 07:57, Emir Arnautovic <
>> > > > > emir.arnauto...@sematext.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi Nitin,
>> > > > > > You can use pf parameter to boost results with exact phrase. You
>> > can
>> > > > also
>> > > > > > use pf2 and pf3 to boost results with bigrams (phrase matches
>> with
>> > 2
>> > > > or 3
>> > > > > > words in case input is with more than 3 words)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Regards,
>> > > > > > Emir
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On 16.02.2016 06:18, Nitin.K wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> I am using edismax parser with the following query:
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> localhost:8983/solr/tgl/select?q=eating%20disorders&wt=xml&tie=1.0&rows=200&q.op=AND&indent=true&defType=edismax&stopwords=true&lowercaseOperators=true&debugQuery=true&qf=topic_title%5E100+subtopic_title%5E40+index_term%5E20+drug%5E15+content%5E3&pf2=topTitle%5E200+subTopTitle%5E80+indTerm%5E40+drugString%5E30+content%5E6
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Configuration of schema.xml
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> <field name="topic_title" type="text_general" indexed="true"
>> > > > > stored="true"
>> > > > > >> />
>> > > > > >> <field name="topTitle" type="string" indexed="true"
>> > stored="false"/>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> <field name="subtopic_title" type="text_general" indexed="true"
>> > > > > >> stored="true"/>
>> > > > > >> <field name="subTopTitle" type="string" indexed="true"
>> > > > stored="false"/>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> <field name="index_term" type="text_ws" indexed="true"
>> > stored="true"
>> > > > > >> multiValued="true"/>
>> > > > > >> <field name="indTerm" type="string" indexed="true"
>> stored="false"
>> > > > > >> multiValued="true"/>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> <field name="drug" type="text_ws" indexed="true" stored="true"
>> > > > > >> multiValued="true"/>
>> > > > > >> <field name="drugString" type="string" indexed="true"
>> > stored="false"
>> > > > > >> multiValued="true"/>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> <field name="content" type="text_general" indexed="true"
>> > > > stored="true"/>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> <copyField source="topic_title" dest="topTitle"/>
>> > > > > >> <copyField source="subtopic_title" dest="subTopTitle"/>
>> > > > > >> <copyField source="index_term" dest="indTerm"/>
>> > > > > >> <copyField source="drug" dest="drugString"/>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> <fieldType name="text_general" class="solr.TextField"
>> > > > > >> positionIncrementGap="100" omitNorms="true">
>> > > > > >>         <analyzer type="index">
>> > > > > >>                         <tokenizer
>> > > > > class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
>> > > > > >>                         <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory"
>> > > > > >> ignoreCase="true"
>> > > > > >> words="stopwords.txt" />
>> > > > > >>                         <filter
>> > > class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>> > > > > >>         </analyzer>
>> > > > > >>         <analyzer type="query">
>> > > > > >>                         <tokenizer
>> > > > > class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
>> > > > > >>                         <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory"
>> > > > > >> ignoreCase="true"
>> > > > > >> words="stopwords.txt" />
>> > > > > >>                         <filter
>> class="solr.SynonymFilterFactory"
>> > > > > >> synonyms="synonyms.txt"
>> > > > > >> ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
>> > > > > >>                         <filter
>> > > class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>> > > > > >>         </analyzer>
>> > > > > >> </fieldType>
>> > > > > >> <fieldType name="text_ws" class="solr.TextField"
>> > > > > >> positionIncrementGap="100"
>> > > > > >> omitTermFreqAndPositions="true" omitNorms="true">
>> > > > > >>         <analyzer>
>> > > > > >>                         <tokenizer
>> > > > > >> class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
>> > > > > >>                         <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory"
>> > > > > >> ignoreCase="true"
>> > > > > >> words="stopwords.txt" />
>> > > > > >>                         <filter
>> > > class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>> > > > > >>         </analyzer>
>> > > > > >> </fieldType>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> I want , if user will search for a phrase then that pharse
>> should
>> > > > always
>> > > > > >> takes the priority in comaprison to the individual words;
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Example: "Eating Disorders"
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> First it will search for "Eating Disorders" together and then
>> the
>> > > > > >> individual
>> > > > > >> words "Eating" and "Disorders"
>> > > > > >> but while searching for individual words, it will always return
>> > > those
>> > > > > >> documents where both the words should exist for which i am
>> already
>> > > > using
>> > > > > >> q.op="AND" in my query.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Thanks,
>> > > > > >> Nitin
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> --
>> > > > > >> View this message in context:
>> > > > > >>
>> > > >
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257510.html
>> > > > > >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log
>> > > Management
>> > > > > > Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > --------------------------
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Benedetti Alessandro
>> > > > > Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti
>> > > > >
>> > > > > "Tyger, tyger burning bright
>> > > > > In the forests of the night,
>> > > > > What immortal hand or eye
>> > > > > Could frame thy fearful symmetry?"
>> > > > >
>> > > > > William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > --------------------------
>> > >
>> > > Benedetti Alessandro
>> > > Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti
>> > >
>> > > "Tyger, tyger burning bright
>> > > In the forests of the night,
>> > > What immortal hand or eye
>> > > Could frame thy fearful symmetry?"
>> > >
>> > > William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England
>> > >
>> >
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Binoy Dalal
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------
>
> Benedetti Alessandro
> Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti
>
> "Tyger, tyger burning bright
> In the forests of the night,
> What immortal hand or eye
> Could frame thy fearful symmetry?"
>
> William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England
>



-- 
--------------------------

Benedetti Alessandro
Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti

"Tyger, tyger burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?"

William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England

Reply via email to