Thanks for the reply.

I easily re produced it in my "sandbox" env.  Steps to re produce
1. Setup a master
2. Setup a slave in a different server
3. The slave replicated the master index
4. From now on not even a single document is added. No optimization or what
so ever is done on the master or slave
5. I stop the master
6. I start the master
7. I see the slave is replicating/copying the entire index

This is exactly what happened  in production when I restarted the master.

I attached the configurations files.

Replication section:

*Master:*

<requestHandler name="/replication" class="solr.ReplicationHandler">
  <lst name="master">
    <str name="replicateAfter">commit</str>
  </lst>
</requestHandler>

*Slave:*

  <requestHandler name="/replication" class="solr.ReplicationHandler" >
        <lst name="slave">
            <str name="masterUrl">
http://solr01-isrl01.flr.local:8983/solr/replication-master/replication
</str>
            <str name="pollInterval">00:00:60</str>
        </lst>
    </requestHandler>



Best,
Lior

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> What does your configuration file look like for the replication
> handler? Does this happen whenever you restart a slave even if
> _nothing_ has changed on the master?
>
> And this will certainly happen if you're optimizing the master before
> you restart, although that doesn't sound likely.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Lior Sapir <lior.sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Solr slave is doing full replication (entire index) of index after master
> > restart
> > Using solr 5.3.1 not cloud (using maser slave architecture ) I see that
> > slave replicates entire index after master restart even though the index
> > version is the same
> >
> > This is bad for me since the slave which is doing serving replicates 80gb
> > if I restart the server and our service is down
> >
> > I attached a file with some snippets of the slave log  before and after
> the
> > master restart.
> >
> > Is there some default configuration issue causing this problem?
> > Both indexes master and slave were not updated for sure before and after
> the
> > master restart.
> > The index version stayed exactly the same.
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to