The way the data is spread across the cluster is not really uniform. Most of shards have way lower than 50GB; I would say about 15% of the total shards have more than 50GB.
Dorian Hoxha wrote > Each shard is a lucene index which has a lot of overhead. And this overhead depends on what? I mean, if I create an empty collection will it take up much heap size just for "being there" ? Dorian Hoxha wrote > I don't know about static/dynamic memory-issue though. I could not find anything related in the docs or the mailing list either, but I'm still not ready to discard this suspicion... Again, thx for your time -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Dynamic-schema-memory-consumption-tp4329184p4329367.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
