Hmm. Solr really should convert an fq of “a AND b” to separate “a” and “b” fq filters. That should be a simple special-case rewrite. It might take less time to implement than explaining it to everyone.
Well, I guess then we’d have to explain how it wasn’t really necessary to send separate fq params… wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Sep 1, 2017, at 2:01 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Shawn: > > See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7219 > > Try fq=filter(foo) filter(bar) filter(baz) > > Patches to docs welcome ;).... > > On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: >> On 9/1/2017 8:13 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: >>> You can OR cachable filter queries in the latest Solr. There is a special >>> (filter) syntax for that. >> >> This is actually possible? If so, I didn't see anything come across the >> dev list about it. >> >> I opened an issue for it, didn't know anything had been implemented. >> After I opened the issue, I discovered that I was merely the latest to >> do so, it had been requested before. >> >> Can you point to the relevant part of the reference guide and the Jira >> issue where the change was committed? >> >> Thanks, >> Shawn >>
