How far would you take that? Say you had 100 terms joined by AND (ridiculous I know, just sayin' ). Then you'd chew up 100 entries in the filterCache.
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote: > Hmm. Solr really should convert an fq of “a AND b” to separate “a” and “b” fq > filters. That should be a simple special-case rewrite. It might take less > time to implement than explaining it to everyone. > > Well, I guess then we’d have to explain how it wasn’t really necessary to > send separate fq params… > > wunder > Walter Underwood > wun...@wunderwood.org > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > > >> On Sep 1, 2017, at 2:01 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Shawn: >> >> See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7219 >> >> Try fq=filter(foo) filter(bar) filter(baz) >> >> Patches to docs welcome ;).... >> >> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: >>> On 9/1/2017 8:13 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: >>>> You can OR cachable filter queries in the latest Solr. There is a special >>>> (filter) syntax for that. >>> >>> This is actually possible? If so, I didn't see anything come across the >>> dev list about it. >>> >>> I opened an issue for it, didn't know anything had been implemented. >>> After I opened the issue, I discovered that I was merely the latest to >>> do so, it had been requested before. >>> >>> Can you point to the relevant part of the reference guide and the Jira >>> issue where the change was committed? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Shawn >>> >
