Agree with Walter, this is seeming like an XY problem. Also, Solr does _not_ implement strict boolean logic, see: https://lucidworks.com/2011/12/28/why-not-and-or-and-not/
Best, Erick On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote: > I understand what you are asking for. Solr doesn’t work like that. Solr is > not a programming language Short-circuit evaluation isn’t especially useful > for a search engine. > > Most of the work is fetching and uncompressing the posting lists. Calculating > the score for each document is pretty fast. > > Express your query in the Solr/Lucene query language and time it. > > If field1:value1 is required and field2:value2 is optional, your query should > be expressed like this: > > +field1:value1 field2:value2 > > Also, this is beginning to feel like an X-Y problem. What are you trying to > achieve with this evaluation requirement? > > wunder > Walter Underwood > wun...@wunderwood.org > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > >> On Feb 7, 2018, at 1:41 PM, bbarani <bbar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Walter, It's just that I have a use case (to evaluate one field over other) >> for which I am trying out multiple solutions in order to avoid making >> multiple calls to SOLR. >> >> I am trying to do a Short-circuit evaluation. >> >> Short-circuit evaluation, minimal evaluation, or McCarthy evaluation (after >> John McCarthy) is the semantics of some Boolean operators in some >> programming languages in which the second argument is executed or evaluated >> only if the first argument does not suffice to determine the value of the >> expression >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html >
