Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com> > wrote: > >> Since isTokenized() more reflects if something is tokenized at the >> Lucene level, perhaps we need something that specifies if there is >> more than one logical value per field value? I'm drawing a blank on a >> good name for such a method though... >> > > boolean singleValuedFieldCache()? > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com > Since everything seems to weigh towards calling out multi, why not multiValuedFieldCache?
Either one sounds good to me though. -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com
