We're on 1.6 already. Any chance you could share your GC settings?
Thanks, Andrew. PS apologies for the duplicate message yesterday, Nabble threw an exception when I posted the first one. And the second one actually. Jaco-4 wrote: > > Hi, > > We had a similar case once (although not with those really long response > times). Fixed by moving to JRE 1.6 and tuning garbage collection. > > Bye, > > Jaco. > > 2009/11/3 Andrew Clegg <andrew.cl...@gmail.com> > >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'm experimenting with highlighting for the first time, and it seems >> shockingly slow for some queries. >> >> For example, this query: >> >> >> http://server:8080/solr/select/?q=transferase&qt=dismax&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on >> >> takes 313ms. But when I add highlighting: >> >> >> http://server:8080/solr/select/?q=transferase&qt=dismax&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on&hl=true&hl.fl=*&fl=id >> >> it takes 305212ms = 5mins! >> >> Some of my documents are slightly large -- the 10 hits for that query >> contain between 362 bytes and 1.4 megabytes of text each. All fields are >> stored and indexed, and most are termvectored. But this doesn't seem >> excessively large! >> >> Has anyone else seen this sort of behaviour before? This is with a >> nightly >> from 2009-10-26. >> >> All suggestions would be appreciated. My schema and config files are >> attached... >> >> http://old.nabble.com/file/p26160217/schema.xml schema.xml >> http://old.nabble.com/file/p26160217/solrconfig.xml solrconfig.xml >> >> Thanks (once again), >> >> Andrew. >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/Highlighting-is-very-slow-tp26160217p26160217.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Highlighting-is-very-slow-tp26160217p26194384.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
