On Jan 7, 2010, at 12:11 PM, MitchK wrote:
Thank you, Ryan. I will have a look on lucene's material and luke.
I think I got it. :)
Sometimes there will be the need, to response on the one hand the
value and
on the other hand the indexed version of the value.
How can I fullfill such needs? Doing copyfield on indexed-only fields?
see erik's response on 'analysis request handler'
ryantxu wrote:
On Jan 7, 2010, at 10:50 AM, MitchK wrote:
Eric,
you mean, everything is okay, but I do not see it?
Internally for searching the analysis takes place and writes to
the
index in an inverted fashion, but the stored stuff is left alone.
if I use an analyzer, Solr "stores" it's output two ways?
One public output, which is similar to the original input
and one "hidden" or internal output, which is based on the
analyzer's work?
Did I understand that right?
yes.
indexed fields and stored fields are different.
Solr results show stored fields in the results (however facets are
based on indexed fields)
Take a look at Lucene in Action for a better description of what is
happening. The best tool to get your head around what is happening
is
probably luke (http://www.getopt.org/luke/)
If yes, I have got another problem:
I don't want to waste any diskspace.
You have control over what is stored and what is indexed -- how that
is configured is up to you.
ryan
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Custom-Analyzer-Tokenizer-works-but-results-were-not-saved-tp27026739p27063452.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
