No, the equivalent for this will be: - A: (the lazy fox) *OR* B: (the lazy fox) - C: (the lazy fox)
Imagine the situation that you dont have in B 'the lazy fox', with the AND you get 0 results although you have 'the lazy fox' in A and C Marco Martínez Bautista http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta 28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón Tel.: 91 352 59 42 2010/5/17 Xavier Schepler <xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr> > Hey, > > let's say I have : > > - a field named A with specific contents > > - a field named B with specific contents > > - a field named C witch contents only from A and B added with copyField. > > Are those queries equivalents in terms of performance : > > - A: (the lazy fox) AND B: (the lazy fox) > - C: (the lazy fox) > > ?? > > Thanks, > > Xavier > > > >
