Cool, I must have configured something wrong then, because it wasn't working for me.
Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik.hatc...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 7:51 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: REST calls Solr has 304 support with the last-modified and etag headers. Erik On Jun 30, 2010, at 7:52 PM, Jason Chaffee wrote: > In that case, being able to use Accept headers and conditional GET's > would make them more powerful and easier to use. The Accept header > could be used, if present, otherwise use the query parameter. Or, > vice > versa. Also, conditional GET's are a big win when you know the data > and > results are not changing often. > > Jason > > -----Original Message----- > From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik > Seeley > Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 7:12 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: REST calls > > Solr's APIs are described as "REST-like", and probably do qualify as > "restful" the way the term is commonly used. > > I'm personally much more interested in making our APIs more powerful > and easier to use, regardless of any REST purity tests. > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com
