Dennis, I wasn't trying to force your admission of my rectitude - I was just getting frustrated that the conversation was moving in spiral fashion, and was worried that you might have intentionally engineered that.
I'm glad to hear that you weren't flame baiting. Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Dennis Gearon [mailto:gear...@sbcglobal.net] > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 3:35 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: How do I this in Solr? > > I'm the LAST person anyone will ever need to worry about flame baiting. > You did notice that I retracted what I said and supported your point of > view? > > Sorry if my cryptic comment sounded critical. I was wrong, you were right > :-) > Dennis Gearon > > Signature Warning > ---------------- > It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a > better idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make > them yourself. from > 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036' > > EARTH has a Right To Life, > otherwise we all die. > > > --- On Tue, 10/26/10, Steven A Rowe <sar...@syr.edu> wrote: > > > From: Steven A Rowe <sar...@syr.edu> > > Subject: RE: How do I this in Solr? > > To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" <solr-user@lucene.apache.org> > > Date: Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 12:27 PM > > Hi Dennis, > > > > You wrote: > > > If Solr is like Google, once documents matching only > > the ANDed items > > > in the query ran out, then those that had only two of > > the terms, then > > > only 1 of the terms, and then those close to it would > > start showing up. > > [...] > > > Plus, if he wants terms that contain ONLY those words, > > and no others, an > > > ANDed query would not do that, right? ANDed queries > > return results that > > > must have ALL the terms listed, and could have lots of > > other words, right? > > > > This is *exactly* what I just said: ANDed queries (i.e., > > requiring all query terms) will not satisfy Varun's > > requirements. > > > > Your participation in this thread looks an awful lot like > > flame-bating: Someone else asks a question, I answer with a > > possible solution, you give a one-word "overkill" response, > > I say why it's not overkill. You then ask if anybody > > knows the answer to the original question, and then parrot > > my response to your "overkill" statement. Really???? > > > > Get your shit together or shut up. Please. > > > > Steve > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Dennis Gearon [mailto:gear...@sbcglobal.net] > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 3:14 PM > > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > > Subject: RE: How do I this in Solr? > > > > > > > > > > > > Dennis Gearon > > > > > > Signature Warning > > > ---------------- > > > It is always a good idea to learn from your own > > mistakes. It is usually a > > > better idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you > > do not have to make > > > them yourself. from > > > 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036' > > > > > > > EARTH has a Right To Life, > > > otherwise we all die. > > > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 10/26/10, Steven A Rowe <sar...@syr.edu> > > wrote: > > > > > > > From: Steven A Rowe <sar...@syr.edu> > > > > Subject: RE: How do I this in Solr? > > > > To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" > > <solr-user@lucene.apache.org> > > > > Date: Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 12:10 PM > > > > Dennis, > > > > > > > > Do you mean to say that you read my earlier post, > > and > > > > disagree that it would solve the problem? Or > > have you > > > > simply not read it? > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Dennis Gearon [mailto:gear...@sbcglobal.net] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 3:00 PM > > > > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > > > > Subject: RE: How do I this in Solr? > > > > > > > > > > Good point. Since I might need such a query > > myself > > > > someday, how *IS* that > > > > > done? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dennis Gearon > > > > > > > > > > Signature Warning > > > > > ---------------- > > > > > It is always a good idea to learn from your > > own > > > > mistakes. It is usually a > > > > > better idea to learn from others’ > > mistakes, so you > > > > do not have to make > > > > > them yourself. from > > > > > 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > EARTH has a Right To Life, > > > > > otherwise we all die. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 10/26/10, Steven A Rowe <sar...@syr.edu> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > From: Steven A Rowe <sar...@syr.edu> > > > > > > Subject: RE: How do I this in Solr? > > > > > > To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" > > > > <solr-user@lucene.apache.org> > > > > > > Date: Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 11:46 > > AM > > > > > > Um, maybe I'm way off base, but when > > > > > > Varun said: > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I search with the text "samsung > > andriod > > > > GPS", > > > > > > > search results should only conain > > "samsung", > > > > "GPS", > > > > > > > "andriod" and "samsung andriod". > > > > > > > > > > > > I interpreted that to mean that hit > > documents > > > > should > > > > > > contain terms from the query, and > > nothing else. > > > > Making > > > > > > all terms required doesn't do this. > > > > > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: Matthew Hall [mailto:mh...@informatics.jax.org] > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 > > 2:30 PM > > > > > > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > > Subject: Re: How do I this in > > Solr? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Um.. you could change your default > > clause to > > > > AND > > > > > > rather than or. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That should do the trick. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/26/2010 2:26 PM, Dennis > > Gearon wrote: > > > > > > > > Overkill? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dennis Gearon > > > > > > > >> I can't think of a way to > > do it > > > > without > > > > > > writing new > > > > > > > >> analysis filters. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> But I think you could do > > what you > > > > want with > > > > > > two filters > > > > > > > >> (this is untested): > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> 1. An index-time filter > > that > > > > outputs a single > > > > > > token > > > > > > > >> consisting of all of the > > input > > > > tokens, sorted > > > > > > in a > > > > > > > >> consistent way, e.g.: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> "mobile with > > GPS" > > > > > > -> "GPS mobile > > > > > > > >> with" > > > > > > > >> "samsung > > android" > > > > > > -> "android > > > > > > > >> samsung" > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> 2. A query-time filter > > that outputs > > > > one token > > > > > > per input > > > > > > > >> term combination, sorted > > in the > > > > same > > > > > > consistent way as the > > > > > > > >> index-time filter, e.g.: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> "samsung andriod > > > > > > GPS" > > > > > > > >> -> > > > > > > > >> > > "samsung","android","GPS", > > > > > > > >> "android > > > > > > > >> samsung","GPS > > samsung","android > > > > GPS" > > > > > > > >> "android > > > > > > GPS > > > > > > > >> samsung" > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Steve > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> -----Original > > Message----- > > > > > > > >>> From: Varun Gupta > > [mailto:varun.vgu...@gmail.com] > > > > > > > >>> Sent: Tuesday, > > October 26, 2010 > > > > 9:08 AM > > > > > > > >>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > > >>> Subject: How do I > > this in > > > > Solr? > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> Hi, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> I have lot of small > > documents > > > > (each > > > > > > containing 1 to 15 > > > > > > > >> words) indexed in > > > > > > > >>> Solr. For the search > > query, I > > > > want the > > > > > > search results > > > > > > > >> to contain only > > > > > > > >>> those > > > > > > > >>> documents that > > satisfy this > > > > criteria "All > > > > > > of the words > > > > > > > >> of the search > > > > > > > >>> result > > > > > > > >>> document are present > > in the > > > > search > > > > > > query" > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> For example: > > > > > > > >>> If I have the > > following > > > > documents > > > > > > indexed: "nokia > > > > > > > >> n95", "GPS", "android", > > > > > > > >>> "samsung", "samsung > > andriod", > > > > "nokia > > > > > > andriod", "mobile > > > > > > > >> with GPS" > > > > > > > >>> If I search with the > > text > > > > "samsung > > > > > > andriod GPS", > > > > > > > >> search results should > > > > > > > >>> only > > > > > > > >>> conain "samsung", > > "GPS", > > > > "andriod" and > > > > > > "samsung > > > > > > > >> andriod". > > > > > > > >>> Is there a way to do > > this in > > > > Solr. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> -- > > > > > > > >>> Thanks > > > > > > > >>> Varun Gupta > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
