By and large, spatial solr is being replaced by geospatial, see: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch. I don't think the old spatial contrib is still included in the trunk or 3.x code bases, but I could be wrong....
That said, I don't know whether what you want is on the roadmap there either. Here's a place to start if you want to see the JIRA discussions: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568 Best Erick On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Adam Estrada <estrada.a...@gmail.com>wrote: > I am particularly interested in storing and querying polygons. That sort of > thing looks like its on their roadmap so does anyone know what the status > is > on that? Also, integration with JTS would make this a core component of any > GIS. Again, anyone know what the status is on that? > > *What’s on the roadmap of future features?* > > Here are some of the features and henhancements we're planning for SSP: > > - > > Performance improvements for larger data sets > - > > Fixing of known bugs > - > > Distance facets: Allowing Solr users to be able to filter their results > based on the calculated distances. > - > > Search with regular polygons, and groups of shapes > - > > Integration with JTS > - > > Highly optimized distance calculation algorithms > - > > Ranking results by distance > - > > 3D dimension search > > > Adam > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Markus Jelsma > <markus.jel...@openindex.io>wrote: > > > That smells like: http://www.jteam.nl/news/spatialsolr.html > > > > > My partner is using a publicly available plugin for GeoSpatial. It is > > used > > > both during indexing and during search. It forms some kind of gridding > > > system and puts 10 fields per row related to that. Doing a Radius > search > > > (vs a bounding box search which is faster in almost all cases in all > > > GeoSpatial query systems) seems pretty fast. GeoSpatial was our > project's > > > constraint. We've moved past that now. > > > > > > Did I mention that it returns distance from the center of the radius > > based > > > on units supplied in the query? > > > > > > I would tell you what the plugin is, but in our division of labor, I > have > > > kept that out of my short term memory. You can contact him at: > > > Danilo Unite <danilo.un...@gmail.com>; > > > > > > Dennis Gearon > > > > > > > > > Signature Warning > > > ---------------- > > > It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually > a > > > better idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make > > > them yourself. from > > > 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036' > > > > > > > > > EARTH has a Right To Life, > > > otherwise we all die. > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > From: George Anthony <pa...@rogers.com> > > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > > Sent: Fri, December 10, 2010 9:23:18 AM > > > Subject: SOLR geospatial > > > > > > In looking at some of the docs support for geospatial search. > > > > > > I see this functionality is mostly scheduled for upcoming release 4.0 > > (with > > > some > > > > > > playing around with backported code). > > > > > > > > > I note the support for the bounding box filter, but will "bounding box" > > be > > > one of the supported *data* types for use with this filter? For > example, > > > if my lat/long data describes the "footprint" of a map, I'm curious if > > > that type of coordinate data can be used by the bounding box filter (or > > in > > > any other way for similar limiting/filtering capability). I see it can > > > work with point type data but curious about functionality with bounding > > > box type data (in contrast to simple point lat/long data). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > George > > >
