I would be more than happy to help with any of the spatial testing you are working on.
adam On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Dennis Gearon <gear...@sbcglobal.net>wrote: > We're in Alpha, heading to Alpha 2. Our requirements are simple: radius > searching, and distance from center. Solr Spatial works and is current. > GeoSpatial is almost there, but we're going to wait until it's released to > spend > time with it. We have other tasks to work on and don't want to be part of > the > debugging process of any project right now. > > Dennis Gearon > > > Signature Warning > ---------------- > It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a > better > idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make them > yourself. > from 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036' > > > EARTH has a Right To Life, > otherwise we all die. > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Sun, December 12, 2010 11:18:03 AM > Subject: Re: SOLR geospatial > > By and large, spatial solr is being replaced by geospatial, see: > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch. I don't think the old > spatial contrib is still included in the trunk or 3.x code bases, but > I could be wrong.... > > That said, I don't know whether what you want is on the roadmap > there either. Here's a place to start if you want to see the JIRA > discussions: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568 > > Best > Erick > > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Adam Estrada <estrada.a...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > I am particularly interested in storing and querying polygons. That sort > of > > thing looks like its on their roadmap so does anyone know what the status > > is > > on that? Also, integration with JTS would make this a core component of > any > > GIS. Again, anyone know what the status is on that? > > > > *What’s on the roadmap of future features?* > > > > Here are some of the features and henhancements we're planning for SSP: > > > > - > > > > Performance improvements for larger data sets > > - > > > > Fixing of known bugs > > - > > > > Distance facets: Allowing Solr users to be able to filter their results > > based on the calculated distances. > > - > > > > Search with regular polygons, and groups of shapes > > - > > > > Integration with JTS > > - > > > > Highly optimized distance calculation algorithms > > - > > > > Ranking results by distance > > - > > > > 3D dimension search > > > > > > Adam > > > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Markus Jelsma > > <markus.jel...@openindex.io>wrote: > > > > > That smells like: http://www.jteam.nl/news/spatialsolr.html > > > > > > > My partner is using a publicly available plugin for GeoSpatial. It is > > > used > > > > both during indexing and during search. It forms some kind of > gridding > > > > system and puts 10 fields per row related to that. Doing a Radius > > search > > > > (vs a bounding box search which is faster in almost all cases in all > > > > GeoSpatial query systems) seems pretty fast. GeoSpatial was our > > project's > > > > constraint. We've moved past that now. > > > > > > > > Did I mention that it returns distance from the center of the radius > > > based > > > > on units supplied in the query? > > > > > > > > I would tell you what the plugin is, but in our division of labor, I > > have > > > > kept that out of my short term memory. You can contact him at: > > > > Danilo Unite <danilo.un...@gmail.com>; > > > > > > > > Dennis Gearon > > > > > > > > > > > > Signature Warning > > > > ---------------- > > > > It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is > usually > > a > > > > better idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to > make > > > > them yourself. from > > > > 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036' > > > > > > > > > > > > EARTH has a Right To Life, > > > > otherwise we all die. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > > From: George Anthony <pa...@rogers.com> > > > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > > > Sent: Fri, December 10, 2010 9:23:18 AM > > > > Subject: SOLR geospatial > > > > > > > > In looking at some of the docs support for geospatial search. > > > > > > > > I see this functionality is mostly scheduled for upcoming release 4.0 > > > (with > > > > some > > > > > > > > playing around with backported code). > > > > > > > > > > > > I note the support for the bounding box filter, but will "bounding > box" > > > be > > > > one of the supported *data* types for use with this filter? For > > example, > > > > if my lat/long data describes the "footprint" of a map, I'm curious > if > > > > that type of coordinate data can be used by the bounding box filter > (or > > > in > > > > any other way for similar limiting/filtering capability). I see it > can > > > > work with point type data but curious about functionality with > bounding > > > > box type data (in contrast to simple point lat/long data). > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > George > > > > > > >
