I've found the same issue. As long as I know, the only solution is to create a copy field which combines both-fields values and facet on this field. If one of the fields has a set of distinct values known in advance and its cardinality c is not too big, it isn't a great problem: you can do with c queries.
El 27/05/2011, a las 15:03, Martijn Laarman escribió: > Hi, > I was wondering if this issue had already been raised. > > We currently have a use case where nested field collapsing would be really > helpful > > I.e Collapse on field X then Collapse on Field Y within the groups returned > by field X > > The current behavior of specifying multiple fields seem to be returning > mutiple result sets. > > Has this already been feature requested ? Does anybody know of a workaround > ? > > Many thanks, > > Martijn
