Thanks for the update David, I'll give that a try now.

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Smiley, David W. <dsmi...@mitre.org> wrote:
> Ryan just updated LSP for Lucene/Solr trunk compatibility so you should do a 
> "mvn clean install" and you'll be back in business.
>
> On Jul 20, 2011, at 10:37 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
>
>> Thanks for responding so quickly, I don't mind waiting a bit.  I'll
>> hang out until the updates have been  made.  Thanks again.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Smiley, David W. <dsmi...@mitre.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Jamie.
>>> I work on LSP; it can index polygons and query for them. Although the 
>>> capability is there, we have more testing & benchmarking to do, and then we 
>>> need to put together a tutorial to explain how to use it at the Solr layer. 
>>>  I recently cleaned up the READMEs a bit.  Try downloading the trunk 
>>> codebase, and follow the README.  It points to another README which shows 
>>> off a demo webapp.  At the conclusion of this, you'll need to examine the 
>>> tests and webapp a bit to figure out how to apply it in your app.  We don't 
>>> yet have a tutorial as the framework has been in flux  although it has 
>>> stabilized a good deal.
>>>
>>> Oh... by the way, this works off of Lucene/Solr trunk.  Within the past 
>>> week there was a major change to trunk and LSP won't compile until we make 
>>> updates.  Either Ryan McKinley or I will get to that by the end of the 
>>> week.  So unless you have access to 2-week old maven artifacts of 
>>> Lucene/Solr, you're stuck right now.
>>>
>>> ~ David Smiley
>>> Author: http://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/
>>>
>>> On Jul 19, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have looked at the code being shared on the
>>>> lucene-spatial-playground and was wondering if anyone could provide
>>>> some details as to its state.  Specifically I'm looking to add
>>>> geospatial support to my application based on a user provided polygon,
>>>> is this currently possible using this extension?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>

Reply via email to