Hi Dan,
Thanks! I'm using boost query to solve this problem.
Floyd
2012/11/21 Daniel Rosher <rosh...@gmail.com>
> Hi
>
> The product function query needs a valuesource, not the pseudo score field.
>
> You probably need something like (with Solr 4.0):
>
> q={!lucene}*:*&sort=product(query($q),2) desc,score
> desc&fl=score,_score_:product(query($q),2),[explain]
>
> Cheers,
> Dan
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Floyd Wu <floyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Before ExternalFielField introduced, change document boost value to
> achieve
> > custom ranking. My client app will update each boost value for documents
> > daily and seem to worked fine.
> > Actual ranking could be predicted based on boost value. (value is
> > calculated based on click, recency, and rating ).
> >
> > I'm now try to use ExternalFileField to do some ranking, after some
> test, I
> > did not get my expectation.
> >
> > I'm doing a sort like this
> >
> > sort=product(score,abs(rankingField))+desc
> > But the query result ranking won't change anyway.
> >
> > The external file as following
> > doc1=3
> > doc2=5
> > doc3=9
> >
> > The original score get from Solr result as fllowing
> > doc1=41.042
> > doc2=10.1256
> > doc3=8.2135
> >
> > Expected ranking
> > doc1
> > doc3
> > doc2
> >
> > What wrong in my test, please kindly help on this.
> >
> > Floyd
> >
>
