OK, if you can attach it to an e-mail, I'll attach it.

Just to check, though, make sure you're logged in. I've been fooled
once or twice by being automatically signed out...

Erick

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Elran Dvir <elr...@checkpoint.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Erick.
>
> I have tried it four times. It keeps failing.
> The problem reoccurred today.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 2:44 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: new field type - enum field
>
> You should be able to attach a patch, wonder if there was some temporary 
> glitch in the JIRA. Is this persisting.
>
> Let us know if this continues...
>
> Erick
>
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Elran Dvir <elr...@checkpoint.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have created an issue:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5084
>> I tried to attach my patch, but it failed: " Cannot attach file 
>> Solr-5084.patch: Unable to communicate with JIRA."
>> What am I doing wrong?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 3:25 PM
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: new field type - enum field
>>
>> Start here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute
>>
>> Then, when your patch is ready submit a JIRA and attach your patch. Then 
>> nudge (gently) if none of the committers picks it up and applies it....
>>
>> NOTE: It is _not_ necessary that the first version of your patch is 
>> completely polished. I often put up partial/incomplete patches (comments 
>> with //nocommit are explicitly caught by the "ant precommit" target for 
>> instance) to see if anyone has any comments before polishing.....
>>
>> Best
>> Erick
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Elran Dvir <elr...@checkpoint.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have implemented like Chris described it:
>>> The field is indexed as numeric, but displayed as string, according to 
>>> configuration.
>>> It applies to facet, pivot, group and query.
>>>
>>> How do we proceed? How do I contribute it?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 4:40 AM
>>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: new field type - enum field
>>>
>>>
>>> : Doable at Lucene level by any chance?
>>>
>>> Given how well the Trie fields compress (ByteField and ShortField have been 
>>> deprecated in favor of TrieIntField for this reason) it probably just makes 
>>> sense to treat it as a numeric at the Lucene level.
>>>
>>> : > If there's positive feedback, I'll open an issue with a patch for the 
>>> functionality.
>>>
>>> I've typically dealt with this sort of thing at the client layer
>>> using a simple numeric field in Solr, or used an UpdateProcessor to
>>> convert the
>>> String->numeric mapping when indexing & used clinet logic of a
>>> DocTransformer to handle the stored value at query time -- but having a 
>>> built in FieldType that handles that for you automatically (and helps 
>>> ensure the indexed values conform to the enum) would certainly be cool if 
>>> you'd like to contribute it.
>>>
>>>
>>> -Hoss
>>>
>>> Email secured by Check Point
>>
>> Email secured by Check Point
>
> Email secured by Check Point

Reply via email to