Did all of the curl update commands return success? Ane errors in the logs?

wunder

On Sep 24, 2013, at 6:40 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:

> Is it possible that some of those 80K docs were simply not valid? e.g.
> had a wrong field, had a missing required field, anything like that?
> What happens if you clear this collection and just re-run the same
> indexing process and do everything else the same?  Still some docs
> missing?  Same number?
> 
> And what if you take 1 document that you know is valid and index it
> 80K times, with a different ID, of course?  Do you see 80K docs in the
> end?
> 
> Otis
> --
> Solr & ElasticSearch Support -- http://sematext.com/
> Performance Monitoring -- http://sematext.com/spm
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Saurabh Saxena <ssax...@gopivotal.com> wrote:
>> Doc count did not change after I restarted the nodes. I am doing a single
>> commit after all 80k docs. Using Solr 4.4.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Saurabh
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
>> otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Interesting. Did the doc count change after you started the nodes again?
>>> Can you tell us about commits?
>>> Which version? 4.5 will be out soon.
>>> 
>>> Otis
>>> Solr & ElasticSearch Support
>>> http://sematext.com/
>>> On Sep 23, 2013 8:37 PM, "Saurabh Saxena" <ssax...@gopivotal.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> I am testing High Availability feature of SolrCloud. I am using the
>>>> following setup
>>>> 
>>>> - 8 linux hosts
>>>> - 8 Shards
>>>> - 1 leader, 1 replica / host
>>>> - Using Curl for update operation
>>>> 
>>>> I tried to index 80K documents on replicas (10K/replica in parallel).
>>>> During indexing process, I stopped 4 Leader nodes. Once indexing is done,
>>>> out of 80K docs only 79808 docs are indexed.
>>>> 
>>>> Is this an expected behaviour ? In my opinion replica should take care of
>>>> indexing if leader is down.
>>>> 
>>>> If this is an expected behaviour, any steps that can be taken from the
>>>> client side to avoid such a situation.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Saurabh Saxena
>>>> 
>>> 

--
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org



Reply via email to